So, I don’t like when a movie comes out based on a book, and they reprint the book to have a movie-poster version of the cover. 

It’s not the reprint’s existence that annoys me, because I know some people enjoy having actors/actresses’ faces staring at them from the front of their books and destroying any other inner notions of what those characters might look and/or act like, thus destroying one of the most amazing things about books (that you’re forced to use your imagination to create the visual world of the story).

No.  That’s fine.  What bugs me is that when they reprint the book, you can NO LONGER FIND ANY COPIES of the original paperback cover, which was, in all likelihood, a way cooler cover.  I mean, not always I guess.  But usually.

And that is today’s random pet peeve.

Also, I am completely aware that if I looked hard enough, I could probably find the original cover somewhere.  If nothing else, it would be online.  But I’m lazy, and I wish the stupid new cover didn’t exist.  So yeah, it is the reprint’s existence that bugs me.  I retract that earlier statement. :)